Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 159 total)
1 2 3 … 11
  • June 13, 2013 at 12:43 pm #3942
    Pete Walentin

    Pretty cool infos. Thanks for sharing.

  • June 12, 2013 at 2:00 am #3936
    Pete Walentin

    Two very beautiful lenses. Both are on my wish list, but they are really hard to get. While waiting I helped myself with a stunning sample of a Jupiter-3 R from 1957. 😉

  • June 11, 2013 at 6:23 am #3931
    Pete Walentin

    Brian, please show us the images, they are not shown. 🙂

  • May 24, 2013 at 11:22 am #3900
    Pete Walentin

    Pretty cool result. Have to play with this one in the next couple of days as well. Thanks Jack.

  • May 22, 2013 at 6:32 pm #3898
    Pete Walentin

    Jack MacD;4568 wrote: The upgrade from LR3 to LR4 was definitely a requirement for S2 users. The LR5 is not essential. I will be surprised if they price it more than $99 for an upgrade from LR4. Or they may make it a subscription like Photoshop?

    Or you buy a new Leica. 🙂

    The dust removal tool enhancement is pretty cool.

  • May 10, 2013 at 9:01 am #3849
    Pete Walentin

    Really, really nice.

  • May 10, 2013 at 8:52 am #3848
    Pete Walentin

    Really nice.

  • April 16, 2013 at 5:39 am #3753
    Pete Walentin

    rootbeer;4415 wrote: I just received a 300 F4 today. A couple of quick shots at the office. F11, ISO 320 1/1000

    That looks pretty nice. I like the color rendition. But I'm going to wait until Leica will release the S350. 😀

  • April 14, 2013 at 10:23 am #3741
    Pete Walentin

    Hi Jack,

    Thanks a lot. 🙂

    Looks pretty impressive. Are these out of camera (except of the last one) and if not, what have you done to the files in terms of sharpening and lens corrections?

    It looks to me that you already have at f/11 some diffraction, but the performance is still pretty nice.

    Looking forward to more pictures with this lens when you are on the road in sunny Arizona.

    And by the way I would love to have a short TS lens too. 🙂

    Cheers,
    Pete

  • April 13, 2013 at 1:07 pm #3737
    Pete Walentin

    Thanks for posting these Jack.

    I would love to see some made with a tripod.

    Cheers,
    Pete

  • April 8, 2013 at 5:50 am #3724
    Pete Walentin

    peterv;4387 wrote: Hi Pete,

    thanks for sharing these images. They look fantastic, and I personally like seeing the S being used for reportage/documentary.
    I love the look of the 120 mm wide open and I think this approach gives the series a very distinctive look. Very interesting! I must say I find it very brave to use the lens like this, I would probably resort to f4.0 just to be on the safe side with focus …
    Anyway, I think your choice for large aperture works really well. Was 1/4000 short enough, or did you have to use ND's?

    Thanks again, wonderful images of a very interesting place with beautiful people!

    Thanks Peter. I think the S is really build for doing every job and that was my main reason to choose the S over any other MF camera. Take a look at the attached picture my wife took with a D-Lux. That was while shooting with the Monochrome and the S was more or less between my legs in the sand. Does it do any harm? Nope. 🙂

    I was fine with 1/4000th. But we have been there very early and it was partly cloudy. So perfect conditions.

    Scott997;4388 wrote: Amazing images Pete! Very nice work.

    Thanks Scott. 🙂

  • March 28, 2013 at 5:04 am #3693
    Pete Walentin

    GMB;4355 wrote: Well, seems it's my turn. My sensor glass cracked after over2 years in use. And that while on vacation….

    Very sad. Hope you had a second camera in your bag.

  • March 8, 2013 at 9:32 am #3665
    Pete Walentin

    Nice capture.

  • March 4, 2013 at 6:55 pm #3656
    Pete Walentin

    Really nice. I like the tonality.

    Cheers,
    Pete

  • January 24, 2013 at 5:51 am #3499
    Pete Walentin

    Very nice review. Thanks.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 159 total)
1 2 3 … 11