Doug Herr replied to the topic Contax 645 350mm Tele-Apotesar in the forum Alternative Lenses 10 years, 5 months ago
Thanks Bob
Doug Herr replied to the topic Review: S2 verses Leaf Aptus 12! in the forum S2 12 years, 8 months ago
constable;1936 wrote: … The only points I would raise are that in the 35 mm system 300 is never long enough for wildlife (in fact no lense is!)…
Depends on the subject and the photographer. My wildlife lens is the Leica 280mm f/4. I'll use it with an extender as needed, but I sold my longer lenses. I've also used 100mm and 180mm…[Read more]
Doug Herr replied to the topic Contax 645 lenses with Leica S2 in the forum Alternative Lenses 12 years, 10 months ago
The Leica 400mm f/4 Modular APO has been converted to S2 mount:
Doug Herr replied to the topic Leica S2 meets the Leica APO-Telyt-Modular R 400mm f/4! in the forum Alternative Lenses 13 years, 1 month ago
Should we assume the larger lens head would work too?
Doug Herr replied to the topic Suggestions for feature additions in future S2 firmware updates in the forum S2 13 years, 4 months ago
David Farkas;241 wrote: As to the more advanced sensor readout options, this is indeed fairly complicated programming and more core features have taken priority, like continual improvement of AF algorithms.
As a potential S2 user the high ISO noise reduction option would be HUGE for me. I am unwilling to sacrifice low-ISO file quality for…[Read more]
Doug Herr replied to the topic Suggestions for feature additions in future S2 firmware updates in the forum S2 13 years, 4 months ago
David K;231 wrote: Hey Doug… please don't tell us that you're giving up the DMR.
Not until there's something better… which is why I'm following the S2 developments very closely 🙂 From what I can tell I'd have a hard time adjusting to the file quality of mainstream cameras.
These suggested firmware tweaks do not reduce my lust for…[Read more]
Doug Herr replied to the topic Suggestions for feature additions in future S2 firmware updates in the forum S2 13 years, 4 months ago
David Farkas;190 wrote: Dr. Zimmer, head of digital R&D, explained that noise could be reduced by either dropping the sensor readout from 24Mhz to 12Mhz or by using a dual readout vs. a quad readout from the sensor. Either of these options would cut the continous frame rate in half and double the time from capture to review, but also would…